|
Session
5 - Making
This
session was planned as an opportunity for students to complete their
three-dimensional models within the ArtCAM/CAD software and set
it up for the CAM milling machine. The students needed to start
by choosing the size and thickness of the acrylic/Perspex that they
were to work with and set their drawings up to fit with this. Some
of them needed to simplify their ideas. One or two could then begin
to manufacture prototypes using CAM.
Aim
for students:
- To
complete refining their idea ready to make into a physical object
and choose materials
- To appreciate the CAM process of sheet cutting and reassembly
- To begin the process of computer aided manufacture
Outcome
of Lesson:
- A
3D CAD drawing set up for CAM machine
- To have chosen a material
- For some students to begin CAM
This
session also involved an introduction to MiniCAM software and the
processing of their designs ready for milling. This was the start
of the CAM milling process and most of the students successfully
managed this. Unfortunately, there were problems getting the CAM
software to work effectively on this occasion. The students were
able to continue to refine and develop their ideas within ArtCAM
but lost the opportunity of further stimulation to their creative
work by seeing the first CAM products developed from their designs.
The
main difficulty was transferring the ArtCAM files into the machine
code for the Denford milling machine. This is theoretically straightforward
and advice is being sought to find a solution to this problem.
Because
of the technical problems the session focussed instead on getting
students to further refine their designs in ArtCAM and to produce
rendered images of the work. This involved exploring the technical
capabilities of the software in more depth and producing a more
finished output in the software, rather than prototyping with the
CAM machine. Had they not missed out on the first stage of CAM machining,
they would have normally have gone back to their designs in ArtCAM
anyway and refined their designs further in light of the experience
of seeing their prototype as a physical object.
Another
problem was that the machining was planned to be undertaken at the
same time as other students were refining their designs. This presented
problems in terms of trying to do two things at once: teach and
use CAD software in one room and also set up the CAM machine in
another adjoining room. This problem could have been solved by the
availability of a technician. There was also the issue of time:
the length of time (a minimum 30 minutes) to machine even a very
small CAM design had not been taken into account. In the evaluation
it was felt that this would have been an issue even if the machine
had been working perfectly and more time would be needed for manufacturing.
|